AI feedback rating app

Criteria-base:
5: Consistently and explicitly references criteria of a case analysis. Minimal to no feedback is generic.
4: Most feedback explicitly references criteria for a case analysis, but some feedback is generic/does not explicitly reference criteria.
3: Half of the feedback explicitly references criteria and half is generic.
2: Most of the feedback is generic; one piece of feedback somewhat explicitly references criteria for a case analysis.
1: Does not explicitly reference criteria; all feedback is generic.

Clear directions for improvement:
5: Consistently gives clear directions for improvement and references specific student output. Offers specific examples of improved writing; all feedback is clear, and some are ready to be implemented with minimal further research or study.
4: Mostly offers usable feedback; few directions are not spelled out and suggestions are reliably tied to identified sections of the writing; most feedback is clearly usable, some is less clear.
3: Even mix of specific and vague suggestions; some directions are not clearly spelled out or suggestions are not tied to identified sections of the writing.
2: Minimal references to specific student writing or lacks actionable steps/recommendations.
1: Does not reference specific student writing and does not give concrete steps.

Accurate:
5: All feedback is accurate.
4: Most feedback is accurate; one piece of feedback is somewhat inaccurate.
3: Some feedback is accurate; 1 piece of feedback is clearly inaccurate.
2: Feedback is mostly inaccurate.
1: Feedback is inaccurate or irrelevant to student writing.

Prioritization of essential features:
5: All feedback focuses on the most appropriate priority to work on given the writing and essential features of a case analysis.
4: Most feedback is attainable and reasonable to work on next; priorities one of the most appropriate things given current writing and essential features of a case analysis.
3: Even mix of prioritizing essential and nonessential features; some feedback is not attainable or appropriate; other feedback is not essential for the student given their writing.
2: Most feedback is unattainable, nonessential, or inappropriate given the student’s current writing and the priorities of the rubric.
1: Feedback is too difficult for students given their writing level, or feedback does not mention any essential features.

Supportive tone:
5: Feedback is consistently affirming; uses suggestive and respectful language; balance of positive comments/appraisals and suggestions for improvement.
4: Most feedback uses suggestive/supportive language, but some does not, it may have an imbalance of affirmations and suggestions for improvement.
3: Even mix of suggestive/directive language; may lack specific affirmation.
2: Most language is directive (not suggestive) or lacks any positive affirmation.
1: No positive comments and no suggestive/respectful language. The tone may be condescending, not polite.